A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier and the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has advanced right into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design works at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct position. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Periods documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and situations attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other René Collier side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair merely endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon professional guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into The ocean all through a storm, do not change the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute more than building of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily actuality with the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with one another prolonged following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely carry on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.